en.osm.town is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
An independent, community of OpenStreetMap people on the Fediverse/Mastodon. Funding graciously provided by the OpenStreetMap Foundation.

Server stats:

261
active users

#obstruction

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

State by State Pending and Recently Passed #AntiProtestLaws: #Louisiana

HB 737: #Vague ban on #ResidentialProtests

Broadly criminalizes participating in a protest within 50 feet of a residence that “threatens to disrupt, or harasses” an individual’s “right to control or use” their residence. The law does not make exceptions for protests that take place in #PublicParks or on #sidewalks—traditional public forums—that may be within 50 feet of residential buildings. Nor does the law require any intent on the part of protesters to target a specific residence or to harass or disturb specific residents. The law also does not require that a protest actually disrupt an individual's right to use their residence, only that it "threaten" to do so. It is also unclear what would constitute "harassing" an individual's right to use their residence, for the purpose of the law.

Full text of bill:
legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.as

Status: enacted

Introduced 18 Mar 2024; Approved by House 9 April 2024; Approved by Senate 20 May 2024; Signed by Governor Landry 18 June 2024

HB 383: Civil immunity for drivers who hit protesters

Limits the civil liability of drivers who injure or kill protesters who were unlawfully in the street. The law provides that if a driver hits someone who was illegally “blocking a roadway,” the driver cannot be sued for any injury, death, or damage if he “reasonably believe[d]” that he was in immediate danger of injury and was trying to “retreat or escape.” The sponsor cited a rise in protests across the country as motivation for the bill.

Full text of bill:
legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.as

Status: enacted

Introduced 29 Feb 2024; Approved by House 8 April 2024; Approved by Senate 20 May 2024; Signed by Governor Landry 11 June 2024

Issue(s): #DriverImmunity, #TrafficInterference

HB 205: New #racketeering penalties for protesters

Adds nonviolent protest-related offenses to the underlying crimes that can be prosecuted under Louisiana’s racketeering law, which carries steep penalties. Offenses that are now covered by the racketeering law include “simple #obstruction of a #highway of commerce,” “#riot,” “inciting to riot,” "institutional #vandalism," and “aiding and abetting others to enter or remain on premises where forbidden.” As such, individuals in a protest that merely makes movement on a #highway “more difficult” (a minor misdemeanor offense) could be charged with a violation of Louisiana’s racketeering law if they did so more than once and as part of an enterprise with others. Louisiana law defines “riot” broadly, requiring no actual violence or damage but three or more people engaged in a “#PublicDisturbance” that creates a “danger of injury or damage” by an “imminent threat of tumultuous and violent conduct,” so individuals who participate in tumultuous protests could likewise be charged with racketeering. The law also adds “criminal damage to a critical infrastructure” to the racketeering law, such that certain #CivilDisobedience actions near #pipelines and other #infrastructure, including sites under construction, could be covered as well. Racketeering violations are punishable by up to 50 years in #prison with #HardLabor and a one million dollar fine.

Full text of bill:
legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.as

Status: enacted

Introduced 26 Feb 2024; Approved by House 2 April 2024; Approved by Senate 14 May 2024; Signed by Governor Landry 10 June 2024

Issue(s): #ProtestSupporters or Funders, Infrastructure, Riot, #Trespass

HB 127: Heightened penalties for #StreetProtesters and organizers

Increases existing penalties for impeding traffic and creates a new offense that could cover individuals who plan or organize protests that would impede traffic. Under prior law in Louisiana, engaging in conduct that makes movement on any road “more difficult” was a misdemeanor, punishable by six months in jail and $200. The law adds an offense of “#conspiracy” or “aiding and abetting” of others to engage in such conduct. As written, the new offense does not require that that the protest or other act actually take place or that it actually impede traffic. The law also increases the fine for both offenses to $750.

Full text of bill:
legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.as

Status: enacted

Introduced 22 Feb 2024; Approved by House 15 April 2024; Approved by Senate 16 May 2024; Signed by Governor Landry 10 June 2024

Issue(s): Protest Supporters or Funders, Traffic Interference

HB 727: NEW PENALTIES FOR PROTESTS NEAR GAS AND OIL PIPELINES

Targets protests around gas and oil #pipelines by expanding the definition of "critical infrastructure" and providing for the offense of "unauthorized entry of a critical infrastructure." Under the law, "critical infrastructure" is amended to include "pipelines," "any site where the construction or improvement of [pipelines or any other listed infrastructure facility] is taking place," as well as "all structures, equipment, or other immovable or movable property located within or upon" such facilities. Unauthorized entry onto critical infrastructure property as defined above is punishable by imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to five years and a fine of $1,000. As originally introduced, the law included a new crime of "conspiracy to engage in unauthorized entry" of a critical infrastructure facility, punishable by imprisonment with or without hard labor for up to five years and a fine of $10,000, such that individuals who only planned to hold a peaceful protest on infrastructure property could be prosecuted. The amended and enacted version of the bill removed the provisions on conspiracy, however. In addition, prior to the law's enactment, provisions were added to mandate that the law would not apply to "[l]awful assembly and peaceful and orderly petition, picketing, or demonstration for the redress of grievances or to express ideas or views regarding legitimate matters of public interest."

Full text of bill:
legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.as

Status: enacted

Introduced 26 Mar 2018; Approved by House 12 April 2018; Approved by the Senate 8 May 2018; Signed into law by Governor Edwards 30 May 2018

Issue(s): Infrastructure, #Trespass

#FirstAmendment #CriminalizingDissent
#Authoritarianism #Fascism #Clampdown #CriminalizingProtest
#CharacteristicsOfFascism #USPol #AntiProtestLaws #PipelineProtests #HeatherHeyer #UniteTheRight #DrivingDownProtestors

www.legis.la.govHB737

Networks of climate obstruction: Discourses of denial and delay in US fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical industries

"An analysis of the nine top players in the U.S. fossil fuel-derived hydrocarbon industries (oil/gas, plastics, and agrichemicals) shows tight linkages across the three different sectors, with news media, other petrochemical industry players, and politicians also frequently tagged, according to a study published January 15, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS Climate by Alaina Kinol from Northeastern University, United States, and colleagues...Our study suggests that climate obstruction in different industries is more coordinated than is generally recognized...these different companies in different sectors are using the same strategic messaging to promote a distorted image of their environmental responsibility.” >>
eurekalert.org/news-releases/1

"The use of fossil-derived hydrocarbons in fossil energy, plastic production, and agriculture makes these three sectors mutually reinforcing and reliant on sustained fossil fuel extraction. In this paper, we examine the ways the fossil fuel energy, plastics, and agrichemicals industries interact on social media using Twitter (renamed X as of 2023) data analysis, and we explore the implications of these interactions for policy...."
>>
Kinol A, Si Y, Kinol J, Stephens JC (2025) Networks of climate obstruction: Discourses of denial and delay in US fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical industries. PLOS Clim 4(1): e0000370. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0
#Fossilfuel #extraction #climate #obstruction #denial #delay #energy #plastics #pertrochemicals #agrichemochals #Hydrocarbon Industries #harm #pollution #SocialMedia #PublicDiscourse #ExtremeHeat #PublicHealth #ClimateCrisis #responsibility

EurekAlert!A tangled web: Fossil fuel energy, plastics, and agrichemicals discourse on X/TwitterAn analysis of the nine top players in the U.S. fossil fuel-derived hydrocarbon industries (oil/gas, plastics, and agrichemicals) shows tight linkages across the three different sectors, with news media, other petrochemical industry players, and politicians also frequently tagged, according to a study published January 15, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS Climate by Alaina Kinol from Northeastern University, United States, and colleagues.
Continued thread

The pardons came ahead of Friday's annual anti-#abortion protest March for Life in Washington.

Anti-abortion advocates had been pushing for #Trump to #pardon the anti-abortion protesters charged with violating the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which is intended to protect #AbortionClinics from #obstruction & #threats & was adopted amid a rise in #violence against #AbortionProviders.

Continued thread

In response, the #DOJ asked the #11thCircuit US Court of Appeals in Atl on Tues AM to overturn #AileenCannon’s order.

Acc/to the request, the #SpecialCounsel turned over the report on Tues PM to Garland, who decides what portions of the report should be released publicly.

Prosecutors say the report is 2 volumes. One outlines the mishandling of #ClassifiedDocuments & #obstruction case, & the other details the findings in the DC #ElectionInterference case against #Trump.

Continued thread

“This limited disclosure will further the public interest in keeping congressional leadership apprised of a significant matter within the Department while safeguarding defendants’ interests,” the filing from federal prosecutors says.

Those assurances arrived a day after *Judge* #AileenCannon, a federal judge in Florida, barred the release of the #SpecialCounsel’s entire report for at least 3 days.

#Unfit#criminal#law

Retraites: les macronistes se mettent (encore) en travers de la démocratie parlementaire

Les députés de l’ex-majorité préparent une #obstruction massive pour empêcher le vote sur la proposition de loi d’#abrogation de la #RéformeDesRetraites déposée par les Insoumis. Un énième coup de force qui s’inscrit dans une série de rendez-vous empêchés depuis deux ans.

mediapart.fr/journal/politique

New Trump indictment salvages Trump election obstruction case after Supreme Court immunity ruling

Special counsel #Jack #Smith filed an updated indictment Tuesday against Donald Trump in a bid to #salvage and #strengthen the historic #election #obstruction #case,
following a Supreme Court ruling that granted broad #immunity to presidents for official acts and sharply criticized the prosecutor’s approach.

The #superseding #indictment comes as a critical window was closing for Smith. -- In about 10 days, a Justice Department policy known as “the 60-day rule” will take effect -- forestalling any new filing of charges against the former president.

In a written notice to the court, Smith said that the indictment was
🔸filed “by a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case” and that it
🔸“reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions.”


Trump faces the same four charges related to his alleged attempts to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory.

Smith said he will not seek to have Trump arraigned again on the new version of the indictment and still expects to make a joint proposal with the former president’s defense lawyers this week about how to schedule new pretrial hearings

washingtonpost.com/national-se

The Washington Post · New Trump indictment tries to salvage case after Supreme Court rulingBy Devlin Barrett
Continued thread

#AileenCannon ruled last month that #SpecialCounsel #JackSmith was unlawfully appointed because he was not confirmed for his position by the #Senate, tossing the 40-count #indictment against #Trump for allegedly keeping #ClassifiedDocuments & materials after leaving the WH & #obstruction of govt efforts to retrieve them. Smith & his team are finalizing their #appeal of that decision to the US Court of Appeals for the #11thCircuit, which is due Tues.

#law #NationalSecurity #criminal #legal

Continued thread

#Trump’s #legal team argues the raid was executed w/ “clear intent to engage in political persecution,” acc/to a memo *obtained* by #FauxNews reporter Brooke Singman.

The lawsuit, led by Trump atty Daniel Epstein, alleges that the #DOJ’s actions constituted “tortious conduct” against the fmr president, citing “intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, & abuse of process.”

[Give me a break.]
#law #criminal #obstruction #FrivolousLawsuit #DelayTactic #ClassifiedDocuments