en.osm.town is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
An independent, community of OpenStreetMap people on the Fediverse/Mastodon. Funding graciously provided by the OpenStreetMap Foundation.

Server stats:

258
active users

#cogsci

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

Thirty years ago, I published my PhD dissertation on Letter Spirit --- all about creativity, AI, and cognitive science. My advisor was Doug Hofstadter. Last week I was asked to give a keynote talk about that work in France. The talk was captured in video.
#AI #cogsci #creativity #typography

berryvilleiml.com/2025/02/26/r

Berryville Institute of Machine LearningRevisiting Letter Spirit Thirty Years Later | BIML(crossposted to apothecaryshed) I was honored to be asked to present a talk on my thesis work in Nancy at the Automatic

#introduction Hi, I'm Goji! I'm brand new to the #fediverse !
I'm currently pursuing a B.S. in #cogsci
Lately I've been spending my free time less on writing (I do short stories, and I'd like to self-publish a full novel) and more on reading.
I play some video games, but being a linux-boi has pared that back quite a bit.
My other hobbies are mountain biking, music, and succumbing to depression under a blanket.

You can expect me to talk about: #PoliticalReform, #AI, #foss, #books, university, #veganism, my perfect cats, and other interesting things I am learning about.

I will try to balance my emo, millennial nature with wit and well-written posts about things that matter. If I sound like a whiny bitch, stick around for a bit and see if it changes?

Noticed via a couple of podcasts that some people are using "did not replicate" to mean "didn't turn out to be as useful as claimed"

Yes, *some* psych phenomena turned out to have effect sizes at or close to zero (ego depletion)

But others are vary reliably non-zero (e.g. race IAT scores), we just don't know what - if anything - that means. The phenomenon does *replicate*.

1/

Preprint announcement:

A. Vernazzani and I have just made available a paper of ours, soon to be published in a volume:

philpapers.org/rec/VERFOD-2

It is a sort of companion piece to a paper of ours on representational formats published in PhilSci last year. While that paper proposed a novel computational theory of formats, this one takes a more negative tack, investigating how reliance on everyday intuitions misleads research on formats in cognitive science.