Jan ☕🎼🎹☁️🏋️♂️<p>Ive built a setup for hosting websites which consists of:<br>* Host running <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/microos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>microos</span></a> with <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/podman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>podman</span></a><br>* <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/Treafik" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Treafik</span></a> and <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/sshpiper" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>sshpiper</span></a> at the edge<br>* <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/Nginx" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Nginx</span></a>, php-fpm, <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/mariadb" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mariadb</span></a> + phpmyadmin + nginx or <a href="https://fedi.kcore.org/tags/postgres" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>postgres</span></a> + dbadmin, openssh for each site</p><p>It actually works quite well, openssh keybased access is to transfer files into the containers, traefik does the reverse proxying.</p><p>I'm just wondering if its a sustainable and maintainable setup. Sometimes just going with a "standard" solution seems so much easier.</p>