“OpenStreetMap’s data is crowdsourced, which has always made spectators to the project a bit wary about the quality of the data,”
^ I feel like this is a reoccurring problematic trope. What the fuck does google maps know about my local park? Why do we assume some higher authority is more trustable than community members?
Why do we assume people are going to frequently waste their time editing openstreetmap out of bad faith?
There is no evidence for this trope being true
Google maps gets shit wrong ALL the time and yet nobody treats that as a systematic indicator that Google shouldn't be trusted
As to vandalism on osm - Pokemon GO is a good example of this behavior. App uses OSM for map, so some jerks figured that changing garden to park will yield better pokemons.
Still OSM is way better then any maps and I recommend contributing to it every know and then. Simple mapping your neighborhood or adding road work/newly build building in city is great. You can even learn something in proces and find places you would never fought exists in your area.
OSM is good enough for Ofcom (Britain's Communications Ministry) when you submit your location of radio transmitting equipment for licensing purposes; they've been using it for a few years now even in preference to getting a licence for the govts own Ordnance Survey mapping data (some of which is shared with OSM anyway these days)
@Alonealastalovedalongthe @rory In theory it's about accountability - if a known organization fucks up we can hold them responsible, or at least ask them for their sources, or check for conflicts of interest.
Of course, with successful projects like Wikipedia we have long seen that this was not problem, and with Google we are guaranteeing conflicts of interest rather than preventing it. But this is the logic behind trusting recognizable organizations over "communities".
I think one of the great things about #wikipedia is that it's content doesn't make a quality claim on its own the concept of an encyclopedia is that it requires reference. It's not a primary source. I don't know enough about #openstreetmap (Indeed very little) to say anything as an authority but maybe its data gathering should include a reference to the evidence that proves it's quality.
There's an #OpenStreetMap page on the differences: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users
In #OSM it's essentially the exact opposite. 🙂 “Original Research”, i.e. the OSMer has checked it and vouches for the thing, is the gold standard. The idea is if you can always ask the person who made the edit why they did it.
Yeah I looked at it a bit more and get that. I think what I was thinking is that evidencing it (e.g. taking a photo etc. ) adds substantially to the claim might help. I have a feeling that I am not infallible ;-) I think I would like to be able to take a photo when I make a claim via something like #streetcomplete and be able to demonstrate and review my claim at later dates.
Yah one of the philosophies I like about Open Street Map is that the local person is ultimately the authority on their local environment.
You don't have to have "credentials" to be an authoritative mapper, you just need to live in the place you are mapping and that is wonderful.
Honestly even if it ends up with the information being wrong.. I mean if that is what locals want the map to say about the place they see then 🤷
@Alonealastalovedalongthe @rory also, plenty of google maps data is crowd sourced. You can make suggestions to change business info, add trails...
I guess the difference is that in google maps its a 'suggestion' that has to be approved by some authority. Although im doubtful there really is some additional level of verification google does.
but yah, corporations pose a massive threat to openstreetmap, they have so much money and what openstreetmap does is just too valuable to them for corporations to let openstreetmap grow in directions that are good for the average person
@rory Certainly not in #Amazon's case. They seem to be raw importing GPX data from their prime trucks straight into the map, and often inappropriately tagging or editing existing ways. That whole team could be banned and nothing of value would be lost.
#Telenav is the only other corporate actor I can recall encountering in my area, and they've got their shit together.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!