"David Puente, a former employee of Casaleggio, recounts how, in anticipation of important decisions, the employees and the all-important blog of party co-founder Beppe Grillo would adopt a certain line with the aim of influencing the decision. “It was enough for Grillo to say A, and the members would vote A.”
“It’s a wasted opportunity,” said Yago Bermejo Abati, the project coordinator of Media Lab Prado in Madrid, who was originally involved in designing Podemos’s participation portal. “Given all the initial hope, this is a great disappointment.”
The only disappointing thing here is that there's people out there who believe that adding a layer of "direct democracy" to the system could fix the colossal tower of shit that is representative democracy....
"We may be only just starting to understand how digital democracy can help address the crisis of legitimacy that is affecting different levels of the political process."
No my dude, there is no fixing the "crisis of legitimacy". Representative democracy is a bourgeois scam designed from the ground up to remove power from the people and lock it in a parliament, where it can be safely controlled.
Well, “power to the people” results in the likes of Mr #Salvini becoming a minister.
Are you sure you want the polloi in charge of matters?
Especially when they seem to be the first to forget that in our political system, #democracy operates within the bounds of #freedom, #justice and #legitimacy. Not doing so results in the quickest way to #totalitarianism, as we saw in the early 20th century.
Hope this helps.
@61 I am all for debate, but sealioning is not an option. Consider this my last warning.
What on Earth is sealioning?
So we should accept your assertion about the (Western, I presume?) middle class just because you say so?
Being a technical type, I work with data not mere assertions. If you have provided that information on this thread, I haven't seen it.
@61 no, you are not expected to accept anything because a mr. nobody on the internet says so.
But, on the other hand, the evidence of the devastation brought onto western middle class by neoliberal policies is so abundant and widely accepted as conclusive that pretending this is just me "saying so" is borderline trolling. That's all.
I do not deal with these specific aspects, but I do do market research with some regularity. I don't recall seeing any indications of the Western middle class having become objectively poorer or smaller since the end of the Cold War. The only thing I have seen is increased fiscal pressure (which a priori would be in line with an enrichment of said middle class).
That is why I ask. Perhaps you deal with different datasets than I.
@61 the problem is not the middle class emerging in BIRCS countries (and mind you, we refer to it as "middle class" only because it's comprised of people who are marginally better off compared to the BRICS poor) but the way the wealthiest people on the planet (the famed 1%) vacuumed up wealth. See the B point in the attached chart? That's the western middle class.
This assumes that no wealth has been created since 1990???
Another thing that stands out about the so-called 1% is that it consists of a large number of self-made people, indicating a high degree of social mobility. Effectively, your 1% are just financially very successful middle class.
How did they get there? The two billionaires I've personally dealt with, through hard work, stamina and sheer single-mindedness. Systemically, any of us had the same chances.
Just saw your graph. Are you saying that the #Western middle class is on the 80th percentile of global income distribution? That's hardly something to whine about is it? Also according to your graph, the highest gains were obtained by those in the 0th‒70th percentile, so the lower middle class and the poor. And nobody has actually lost anything (no negative ordinates).